Evidence Hub

Cardioprotective effect of diabetic medication on cancer patients undergoing proven cardiotoxic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

El-Helbawy A, Zaki ST, Hanna F, Bassiouni M, Yaseen KO, Ali AH, Farid OM

Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2026

27,015 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines, have recently shown a fatal potential for cardiotoxic effects in their patients. However, their efficacy is often hindered by their harmful adverse effects, mostly cardiotoxicity. DM medications such as metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists have exhibited promising cardioprotective properties in rat clinical trials. PURPOSE: We conducted our study to investigate the observational association between diabetic medications and Cardioprotective effect in cancer patients treated with cardiotoxic chemotherapeutics. METHODS: A meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines included observational studies comparing diabetic cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Outcomes evaluated were heart failure (HF) incidence, HF exacerbation, atrial fibrillation (AF), hospitalization, and mortality. Data were independently extracted by five investigators from multiple databases up to January 20, 2025. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 27,015 patients were included. DM medication use may be associated with lower mortality (OR 0.50, p < 0.00001), HF incidence (OR 0.36, p = 0.007), HF exacerbation (OR 0.58, p < 0.0001), although heterogeneity was significant. Subgroup analysis revealed that SGLT-2 inhibitors may be associated with reduced mortality by 50%, HF incidence by 64%, and HF exacerbation by 49%. Hazard ratio analysis indicated SGLT-2 inhibitors use was associated with lower mortality risk in patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 27,015 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free