Evidence Hub

Mechanistic Insights Into the Cardioprotective Effects of Modern Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Ratnala M, Johal LK, Galadima ZF, Janjua FF, Trejos Guzman KS, Lal K, Fatima M, Khan M et al.

Cureus, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked to increased cardiovascular risk through mechanisms involving oxidative stress, adverse cardiac remodeling, and endothelial dysfunction. While glucose-lowering therapies improve glycemic control, their mechanistic cardiovascular effects remain incompletely understood. A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with comprehensive searches performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective mechanistic investigations enrolling adults with T2DM, with or without established cardiovascular disease or heart failure. Mechanistic endpoints encompassed echocardiographic indices, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), vascular function, biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation, and metabolic parameters. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A total of 449 records were identified, of which 127 were excluded, leaving nine studies for inclusion. Trials evaluating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors consistently demonstrated improvements in left ventricular remodeling, oxidative stress markers, and functional capacity, with some studies showing preserved mitochondrial respiration and favorable shifts in hemodynamic parameters. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free