Evidence Hub

Impact of quantum and neuromorphic computing on biomolecular simulations: Current status and perspectives

Sandra Diaz-Pier, Paolo Carloni

Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

New high-performance computing architectures are becoming operative, in addition to exascale computers. Quantum computers (QC) solve optimization problems with unprecedented efficiency and speed, while neuromorphic hardware (NMH) simulates neural network dynamics. Albeit, at the moment, both find no practical use in all atom biomolecular simulations, QC might be exploited in the not-too-far future to simulate systems for which electronic degrees of freedom play a key and intricate role for biological function, whereas NMH might accelerate molecular dynamics simulations with low energy consumption. Machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms running on NMH and QC could assist in the analysis of data and speed up research. If these implementations are successful, modular supercomputing could further dramatically enhance the overall computing capacity by combining highly optimized software tools into workflows, linking these architectures to exascale computers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free