Evidence Hub

CGM-based metrics and mortality in older adults living with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy: a secondary analysis of the HYPOAGE study

Smati S, Boureau AS, Gourdy P, Guyomarch B, Annweiller C, Briet C, Cervantes N, Decker L et al.

Diabetes & metabolism, 2026

58 participants

Abstract

Aim: Older adults living with type 2 diabetes represent a particularly vulnerable population. We investigated which continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived targets are associated with all-cause mortality in this population.

Methods: HYPOAGE is prospective multicenter study including 141 insulin-treated older adults living with type 2 diabetes aged 75 and older, under insulin therapy for at least 6 months. All participants underwent standardized geriatric and diabetic assessments and wore an ambulatory blinded CGM (FreeStyle Libre Pro®) for 28 consecutive days. In this ancillary study, multivariable cox regressions were performed to identify factors associated with mortality after adjustment for age, sex, HbA1c, kidney function, geriatric status, and metformin use.

Results: At baseline, participants were 81.5 years old on average. After a median follow-up of 44 months, 58 of 141 patients had died. In adjusted model, higher percentages of level 1 time below range (TBR), level 2 TBR and glycemic variability assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV) were independently associated with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.51 [1.11; 2.06], 1.25 [1.02; 1.53], and 1.76 [1.21; 2.56] for an interquartile range (IQR)% increase of each parameter, respectively). When recommended CGM targets were considered, only glycemic variability (CV ≤ 36%), remained significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.57 [0.32; 0.99]), whereas TIR > 50% and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free