Evidence Hub

Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists vs Metformin in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Almubaddil K, Alotaibi M, Bin Mutreb L, Alanazi F, Altulihee M

Cureus, 2026

218 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder associated with significant metabolic and reproductive dysfunction. Although metformin has long been a cornerstone of PCOS management, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) have emerged as promising alternatives, particularly for improving metabolic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of GLP-1 RAs compared with metformin on metabolic, hormonal, and reproductive parameters in women with PCOS. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1 RAs with metformin in women diagnosed with PCOS were systematically identified and analyzed. Four eligible RCTs comprising a total of 218 participants were included. Statistical analyses were conducted using a fixed-effects model. Compared with metformin, GLP-1 RAs were associated with significant reductions in serum testosterone (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.327, p = 0.036), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) (SMD = -0.528, p = 0.048), androstenedione (SMD = -0.523, p = 0.002), and insulin resistance as assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD = 1.217, p < 0.001). However, substantial heterogeneity across studies and potential publication bias were observed. Overall, GLP-1 RAs were associated with favorable improvements in key hormonal and metabolic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 218 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free