Evidence Hub

Low BMI patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC can get a better outcome from metformin plus EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy: A secondary analysis of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial

R. Han, Jianghua Li, Yu-Bo Wang, Tingting He, Jie Zheng, Yong He

Chinese Medical Journal - Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 2023

224 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background The synergistic association between metformin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been confirmed in in vitro studies. It is still controversial which patients can benefit from metformin plus EGFR-TKIs treatment. Body mass index (BMI) was proved to be independently associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study aimed to investigate whether BMI is associated with the synergistic effect of metformin and EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR mutation (EGFRm)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among nondiabetic Asian population. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective, double-blind phase II randomized clinical trial (COAST, NCT01864681), which enrolled 224 patients without diabetes with treatment-naïve stage IIIB-IV EGFRm NSCLC. We stratified patients into those with a high BMI (≥24 kg/m2) and those with a low BMI (<24 kg/m2) to allow an analysis of the difference in PFS and OS between the two groups. The PFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the differences between groups were compared using log-rank test. Results In the univariate analysis, patients who had a high BMI (n = 56) in the gefitinib + metformin group (n = 28) did not have a better PFS (8.84 months vs. 11.67 months; P = 0.351) or OS (15.58 months vs. 24.36 months; P = 0.095) than those in the gefitinib + placebo group (n = 28). Similar results were also observed in the low-BMI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free