Evidence Hub

Insulin clearance at randomization and in response to treatment in youth with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of the TODAY randomized clinical trial

K. Nadeau, Silva A. Arslanian, F. Bacha, S. Caprio, Lily C. Chao, Ryan Farrell, Kara S. Hughan, Maria Rayas et al.

Diabetologia, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

Insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia are core features leading to beta cell failure in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Insulin clearance (IC) is also a key regulator of insulin concentrations, but few data exist on IC in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. In a secondary analysis of our Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) randomised clinical trial, we investigated potential sex-, race-, ethnicity- and treatment-related differences in IC in youth-onset type 2 diabetes and aimed to identify metabolic phenotypes associated with IC at baseline and in response to metformin, metformin plus a lifestyle intervention, and metformin plus rosiglitazone. A total of 640 youth aged 10–18 years with type 2 diabetes underwent fasting blood tests, anthropometric measurements, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to estimate subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass, and OGTTs longitudinally over 5 years. IC was calculated from the fasting C-peptide:insulin ratio (fasting IC) and 2 h OGTT C-peptide incremental AUC (iAUC):insulin iAUC ratio (2 h IC). Linear mixed models were used to assess covariate effects on the mean of IC over repeated time points. Baseline fasting IC (×10−2 nmol/pmol) was significantly lower in female participants than male participants (median [IQR] 0.72 [0.57–0.93] vs 0.79 [0.63–1.00], respectively; p=0.04) and in non-Hispanic Black participants than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White participants (median…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free