Evidence Hub

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of the SPARTAN trial

Soumyajit Roy, Fred Saad, Shawn Malone, Yi-Lun Sun, D. Spratt, A. Kishan, C. Wallis, Angela Y. Jia et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

1,152 participants

Abstract

5046 Background: While exposure to concomitant medications (conmeds) have been found to influence survival and treatment response in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, it is unclear if exposure to these medications affect treatment response and survival in men with non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI). We performed an exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial to determine whether receipt of conmeds influenced the effect of apalutamide on overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with nmCRPC. Methods: SPARTAN is a phase III randomized controlled trial in which nmCRPC patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive apalutamide or placebo in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We focused on 5 groups of commonly prescribed classes of conmeds: biguanides (metformin), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), acetylsalicylic acid derivatives (ASA), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) given their plausible biologic and clinical rationale. To determine the potential effect-modification, we applied Cox regression models with interaction term between the conmed class, the randomized treatment in addition to a minimally sufficient set of confounders. To determine the independent association of each class of conmeds with outcome, we applied IPTW-based survival analysis and log-rank test. Results: Overall, 1152 patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,152 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free