Evidence Hub

Evaluation of Jinlida Granules in Improvements to Standard-Reaching Rate of Blood Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Symptoms: Results of Secondary Analysis From 12-Week Trial

De Jin, Yu-Qing Zhang, Y. Duan, Xu-Xi An, Xiao-ping Kang, Fengmei Lian, X. Tong

2021

192 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background

The previous study found that the Jinlida could significantly reduce levels of blood glucose and enhance the lowing-glucose action of metformin. However, the role of the standard-reaching rate of blood glucose and improving clinical symptoms in Jinlida has yet to be studied. We aimed to elaborate on the efficacy of Jinlida in Type 2 diabetics who experience clinical symptoms based on secondary analysis from the 12-week trial.

Methods

Data were analyzed from a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, study of Jinlida. The standard-reaching rate of blood glucose, total symptom score, the efficacy of single symptom, symptom disappearance rate, symptom improvement rate was evaluated. Then, the correlation of the symptom effective rate and HbA1c was analyzed.

Results

192 T2DM patients were randomly allocated to receive either Jinlida or a placebo for 12 consecutive weeks. The standard-reaching rate of HbA1c (<6.5%) was 25% in the treatment group when compared to 14.9% in the control group. (P=0.046); All the symptom exhibited a change difference, comparing the treatment group to the control group after 12 weeks’ intervention. (P< 0.05); Hunger, polyuria, dry mouth, sweating and dysphoria in chestpalms-soles symptoms exhibited a change difference in the treatment group, compared to that in the control group. (P<0.05). All the symptom exhibited a significant difference in symptom improvement rate. (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Jinlida glandule can effectively improve clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free