Evidence Hub

Neoadjuvant metformin on clinical and pathological response in non-diabetic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

D. Arriaga-Izabal, F. Morales-Lazcano, U. Angulo-Zamudio, Adrian Canizalez-Román, N. León-Sicairos

Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2026

1,125 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Metformin has been explored as an anticancer agent in breast cancer, but randomized trial evidence remains inconsistent. This updated review evaluated neoadjuvant metformin's effect on response outcomes in non-diabetic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted (PROSPERO: CRD420251039988). PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP were searched until April 2025. Randomized-controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant metformin plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in non-diabetic patients with stage I-III breast cancer were included. Primary outcomes were pathological and clinical complete response (pCR/cCR); secondary outcomes were overall response and pathological response (oRR/oPR), with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) evaluated as a tertiary outcome. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Post-hoc meta-regression and subgroup analyses were also performed.

Results: Fifteen trials, including 1,125 patients, were analyzed. Metformin was not significantly associated with improvements in pCR (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.40), cCR (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.87-2.70), oRR (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.89-1.69), oPR (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.52), or BCS (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.35). Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested increased pCR in HER2 + disease (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). Higher study-level body mass index (BMI) was associated with improved response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,125 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free