Evidence Hub

In-silico strategies in nano-drug design: Bridging nanomaterials and pharmacological applications

Nagarjuna Prakash Dalbanjan, Karuna Korgaonkar, Manjunath P. Eelager, Basavaraj Neelappa Gonal, Arihant Jayawant Kadapure, Suresh Basavaraj Arakera, S. K. Praveen Kumar

Nano TransMed, 2025

46 citations

Abstract

Rapid advancements in nanotechnology have transformed drug design and delivery systems, allowing for precise and efficient therapeutic interventions. This review examines the transformative role of in-silico approaches in nano-drug design, focusing on their ability to predict, optimize, and refine nanomaterial properties for pharmacological applications. Key computational tools such as molecular modelling, machine learning, computational fluid dynamics, and bioinformatics are thoroughly investigated, with a focus on their contributions to understanding drug loading, toxicity, targeting strategies, and nano-bio interactions. Furthermore, the incorporation of emerging technologies like digital twins and quantum computing shows the potential to overcome current limitations in accuracy, scalability, and personalization. Despite significant progress, challenges remain, particularly in closing the gap between computational predictions and experimental validations, dealing with data quality issues, and navigating regulatory frameworks. This review emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation in realizing the full potential of in-silico methods for advancing nanotherapeutics. Addressing these challenges positions the field to accelerate the development of safe, effective, and personalized medicines.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free