Evidence Hub

Comparison of Visceral Fat Reduction by Ipragliflozin and Metformin in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Sub-Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Study

M. Koshizaka, Ko Ishikawa, Ryoichi Ishibashi, Sho Takahashi, Kenichi Sakamoto, H. Yokoh, Yusuke Baba, Shintaro Ide et al.

Diabetes Therapy, 2020

103 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

Introduction To compare the effects of ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor, with those of metformin on visceral fat (as well as muscles and bones) in Japanese elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), we conducted a sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter, blinded-endpoint randomized-controlled study. Methods In total, 103 patients with T2D (body mass index ≥ 22 kg/m 2 ; glycated hemoglobin, 7–10%) and being treated with sitagliptin (a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) were included and randomized to receive ipragliflozin or metformin. The primary outcome was the change in visceral fat area measured using computed tomography 24 weeks following treatment. The secondary outcomes included changes in subcutaneous and total fat area, muscle volume, bone density measured using computed tomography, handgrip strength, bone markers, plasma glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)2-beta, HOMA2-R, glycated hemoglobin, lipid panel, uric acid, blood pressure, adiponectin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. All patients aged 65–74 years were selected for sub-analysis. Results The sub-analysis included 15 and 14 patients in the ipragliflozin and metformin groups, respectively. The patients’ backgrounds were well balanced. Visceral fat area reduction was greater in the ipragliflozin group than in the metformin group (− 10.58% vs. − 6.93%; P = 0.034). There were significant differences in the changes in bone absorption markers, uric acid, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 103 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free