Evidence Hub

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardioprotective Benefit in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Without Baseline Metformin: An Update Meta-analysis

A. L. Cobo, W. Masson, M. Lobo, G. Masson, G. Molinero

2021

10,419 participants

Abstract

Background: Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) in type 2 diabetes. Most of the patients included in these trials received metformin as background therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events (MACE) in metformin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of GLP-1RAs on type 2 diabetes populations, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scielo, Google Scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. The primary endpoint was MACE. The secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes was performed.Results: Six eligible trials, including 10419 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. GLP-1RAs were associated with a significant reduction in MACE incidence (HR: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.80–0.94; I2:0%). The analysis of the secondary endpoints showed a non-significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00 I2:0%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–1.05; I2:0%). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, GLP-1RAs reduced the incidence of MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10,419 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free