Evidence Hub

Can metformin change the prognosis of pancreatic cancer? Retrospective study for pancreatic cancer patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus type 2

Lee SH, Yoon SH, Lee HS, Chung MJ, Park JY, Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB et al.

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2016

237 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: The effect of metformin on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer is controversial.

AIMS: To investigate the beneficial effect of metformin in pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with pancreatic cancer and pre-existing diabetes mellitus type 2 who were treated at Severance Hospital (Seoul, South Korea) between May 2005 and December 2013.

RESULTS: Among 237 enrolled patients, 117 patients (49.4%) were exposed to metformin. The median overall survival was 13.7 months for the metformin group versus 8.9 months for the non-metformin group (P=0.001) In univariate analysis, metformin exposure, low serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels (<1000 U/mL), small tumor size (≤20 mm), no tail involvement, good performance status (ECOG 0 vs. 1 or 2), and resectable cancer stage were associated with favorable survival outcomes (all P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, in addition to low serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels (<1000 U/mL) and resectable cancer stage, metformin exposure was significantly associated with longer survival with a hazard ratio of 0.61 (P=0.001). Additionally, the cumulative duration of metformin use was significantly correlated with a favorable survival outcome.

CONCLUSION: Our findings supported that metformin exposure was associated with survival benefits in patients with pancreatic cancer and pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially among those with an advanced cancer stage.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 237 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free