Evidence Hub

Associations of Metformin Use History With Delirium and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Seki T, Yamanashi T, Shimura A, Chang G, Santiago TA, Phuong NJ, Nguyen HD, Gorantla N et al.

Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 2025

506 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Higher body mass index (BMI) generally increases susceptibility to certain diseases. However, previous studies have shown that metformin, a medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), can improve various outcomes, including survival in obese patients. This indicates that the effectiveness of metformin on certain outcomes is more pronounced in those with a higher BMI. It remains unclear if the effects of metformin on delirium risk differ according to BMI.

METHODS: This study analyzed a subset of 506 T2DM subjects from the cohort used in our previous study. We compared delirium cases identified during hospitalization and survival curves among T2DM subjects with and without a history of metformin use, stratified by BMI. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of metformin use history and various other factors on cases of delirium identified during hospitalization and 3-year mortality among T2DM subjects in different BMI groups.

RESULTS: Metformin use history was associated with fewer cases of delirium (odds ratio = 0.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.217-0.820, P = 0.011) and lower 3-year mortality (hazard ratio = 0.564, 95% CI = 0.342-0.931, P = 0.025) among the BMI ≥30 group. On the other hand, the associations between metformin use history and fewer cases of delirium (odds ratio = 0.606, 95% CI = 0.320-1.150, P = 0.125) and lower 3-year mortality (hazard ratio = 0.754, 95% CI = 0.447-1.270, P = 0.288) among the BMI <30 group were relatively small and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 506 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free