Evidence Hub

Prognostic impact of metformin in diabetic patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): protective effect is modified by procedural complexity

Zheng Z, Wang Z, He J, Song Y, Song W, Dou K

Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026

11,585 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metformin, a widely prescribed glucose-lowering agent, has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes who do not have established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, evidence regarding its role specifically in patients with diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains limited. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the prognostic association of metformin use in this high‑risk population and to explore its potential interaction with procedural complexity. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2018, 11,585 diabetic patients undergoing PCI at Fuwai hospital were consecutively enrolled in our study. Patients were categorized into four groups according to metformin use and PCI complexity. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 3 years, a total of 1292 MACCEs were recorded. Overall, metformin use was observed to be associated with a lower incidence of 3-year MACCEs (adjusted HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.70–0.92) after multivariable adjustment. Significantly lower incidence of MACCEs was observed in patients undergoing non-complex PCI (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53–0.79), while such protective effect of metformin didn’t exist in complex PCI patients (adjusted HR 1.00, 95%CI: 0.83–1.21). Significant interaction between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,585 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free