Evidence Hub

A Cross-Domain Meta-Analysis of Coherence-Regulated Quantum Algorithms: Unified Evidence from Multi-Benchmark NISQ Studies

Arturo Cerezo, IA Collaborative Panel — Claude (Anthropic) • ChatGPT (OpenAI) • Gemini (Google) • Grok (xAI)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2025

Abstract

Meta-Analysis — Applied Quantum Computing Track This record presents a unifying meta-analysis of applied benchmarks within the Radial Coherential Dynamics (RCD) research program, synthesizing results across multiple quantum algorithms, system dimensionalities, and problem classes under a single coherence-regulation principle. Building upon the foundational decoherence suppression model (Topological Decoherence Suppression via Coherential Geometry, Zenodo, December 2025, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18000641), and its applied benchmarks in variational and optimization algorithms, this work consolidates evidence that a fixed decoherence scaling law T2→T2/αT_2 \rightarrow T_2/\sqrt{\alpha}T2→T2/α (with α≈1.3×10−4\alpha \approx 1.3 \times 10^{-4}α≈1.3×10−4) produces consistent, non-ad-hoc improvements across NISQ-relevant tasks. The meta-analysis integrates four independent benchmarks: (i) VQE for molecular H₄ (0D), (ii) VQE for a graphene-inspired hexagon (2D, PBC), (iii) VQE for a 1D Hubbard chain (OBC), and (iv) QAOA for MaxCut optimization on graphs. All benchmarks employ a controlled A/B methodology in which identical circuits are executed with standard noise (control) and coherence-regulated noise (treatment), with no parameter tuning introduced at the benchmark level. Across these diverse settings, coherence regulation yields stable reductions in energy error (≈ 40–46% for VQE tasks) and optimization gap (≈ 25% for QAOA), with magnitudes consistent with the underlying decoherence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free