Evidence Hub

Safety of anagliptin/metformin combination tablets evaluated by non-inferiority between pre- and post-serum lactic acid levels in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment (AMELIO STUDY)

Kajio H, Bouchi R, Komatsu M, Yamazaki M, Takarabe D, Okamoto M, Tanaka T, Kitazawa T et al.

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the safety of anagliptin/metformin combination tablets by evaluation of lactic acid levels in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants of type 2 diabetes with creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) of ≥45 and <60 (mL/min/1.73 m2) (Group G3a) received anagliptin/metformin combination LD tablets (anagliptin: 100 mg, metformin hydrochloride: 250 mg/tablet) twice a day for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, they received anagliptin/metformin combination HD tablets (anagliptin: 100 mg, metformin hydrochloride: 500 mg/tablet) twice daily until after 16 weeks. The participants (Group G3b) with baseline eGFRcr ≥30 and <45 (mL/min/1.73 m2) received anagliptin/metformin combination LD tablets twice daily for 16 weeks. The serum lactic acid levels were examined at weeks 4, 8, and 16 after receiving anagliptin/metformin combination tablets.

RESULTS: The change in serum lactic acid levels from baseline to 16 weeks was -0.09 [-0.28, 0.10] mmol/L (mean [95% confidence intervals]), not exceeding the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (0.7 mmol/L). No significant differences occurred in the change in serum lactic acid levels during all observation periods. Serum lactic acid levels exceeded 2.5 mmol/L in four participants (10.5%) and 5.0 mmol/L in one participant (2.6%) during the observation period. No participant had a plasma metformin exceeding 2.5 μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free