Evidence Hub

Environmental Impact Assessment of Hydropower: A Systematic Review of Common Criteria, Dynamic Nature of Criteria, and Emerging Properties

Elham Soleimanian, Nima Zafarmomen

Water Resources Management, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Hydropower has emerged as a critical component of clean energy initiatives worldwide, providing substantial contributions to electricity generation and grid stability. However, the construction and operation of hydropower dams also pose significant environmental and socio-economic challenges, including habitat fragmentation, water quality fluctuations, and community displacement. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) offers a structured framework to evaluate these potential impacts and inform mitigation strategies. Yet existing EIAs often overlook two pivotal dimensions: the dynamic nature of certain criteria and the emergent properties of hydropower as a complex system. This paper addresses these gaps through a systematic review of scholarly articles published between 2000 and 2024, examining current practices in hydropower EIAs and identifying overlooked criteria. Our findings indicate that standard EIAs tend to prioritize static parameters while underrepresenting temporal variability in key biophysical and socio-economic processes (e.g., water temperature, sediment transport, and socio-economic change). Moreover, EIAs typically pay limited attention to emergent system-level outcomes, including changes in local microclimate and community cohesion, which may develop nonlinearly and with substantial uncertainty after dam commissioning. We proposed an analytical framework that classifies EIA criteria into static and dynamic, alongside recommendations for integrating…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free