Evidence Hub

Physics in integrated STEM education research projects: A systematic review in the secondary school context

Siti Hidayana Nassiri, Noorzana Binti Khamis, Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin

Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background and Purpose: This review explores the integration of physics into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education through project-based learning (PjBL) at the secondary school level. It aims to identify common types of integrated STEM projects for physics students and the physics concepts most frequently employed, addressing current gaps in the field. Methodology: Guided by the PRISMA framework, this systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five years and indexed in the Scopus database. Findings: The analysis revealed four main categories of physics-based STEM projects: Inquiry-Based Learning with Technology, Engineering Design Challenge Products, Electronic Module (E-module) Projects, and Abstract Problem-Solving Activities. Physics concepts related to momentum and Newtonian mechanics were most dominant, while thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, electronics, optics, and wave theory were underrepresented. Significant gaps identified include limited interdisciplinary integration, uneven physics content distribution, and inadequate resource availability. Contributions: In response to these findings, a "5-Way Forward" framework is proposed to enhance the quality and impact of STEM project implementation in physics education. This review offers valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers to improve physics engagement in integrated STEM education and suggests directions for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free