Evidence Hub

Instructional Analogies Dominate, Domain-Inherent Metaphors Are Overlooked: A Systematic Review of Metaphorical Mappings in Chemistry Education

Charlotte H. Müller, Martina Angela Rau

Journal of Chemical Education, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Metaphors play a central role in our language. Likewise, they are ubiquitous in the language related to imperceptible concepts including many chemical concepts. The present systematic review investigates what metaphorical mappings chemistry education research has examined. Specifically, we distinguish between instructional analogies designed for learning and domain-inherent metaphors present in chemical discourse. We pose the research questions: (i) what types of metaphorical mappings are present in chemistry education research and (ii) what the main findings of this research are. We find that instructional analogies are the focus of most research on metaphorical mappings with a special emphasis on two target concepts: atomic structure and chemical reactivity. Most analogies aimed to either make these concepts more tangible or to relate them to the specific lived experience of the students. Research on domain-inherent metaphors is limited to the analysis of conceptual metaphors that experts or students employ during problem-solving and textbook analyses, all related to entropy. We conclude that the source domain needs to be accessible to the learner and that they need to be aware of the limitations. One way to ensure that is by introducing multiple analogies. However, given the gaps we uncovered in this review, we recommend that future research should focus on a more comprehensive analysis of metaphorical mappings inherent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free