Evidence Hub

The Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory Media in Physics Education: A Meta-Analysis on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Higher-Order Thinking Skills

Intan Fitriah, Sari Fitra Zawanis

ISEJ Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has reshaped science education, offering innovative solutions to overcome the limitations of traditional laboratories. In physics, where abstract concepts are often difficult to observe directly, virtual laboratories provide safe, cost-effective, and interactive alternatives for experimentation. This study employed a qualitative meta-analysis supported by descriptive quantitative analysis to synthesize evidence from studies published between 2018 and 2022 on the use of virtual laboratories in inquiry-based physics learning. Data were categorized into achievement indicators such as conceptual mastery, critical thinking, problem-solving, and misconception reduction, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic synthesis. The results indicated a substantial improvement in student performance, with mean scores increasing from 66.42 before intervention to 80.35 afterward, alongside a reduction in achievement gaps across ability levels. Conceptual mastery (25%) and conceptual understanding (20%) were the most frequent outcomes, while higher-order thinking indicators collectively represented 30%. Optics and electricity were the most frequently supported topics, reflecting the strength of simulations in visualizing abstract phenomena. The findings confirm that combining inquiry pedagogy with virtual laboratories yields stronger learning outcomes than either approach alone. This study implies that virtual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free