Evidence Hub

Metformin use is associated with a low risk of tuberculosis among newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients with normal renal function: A nationwide cohort study with validated diagnostic criteria

Ming-Chia Lee, Chen-Yuan Chiang, Chih-Hsin Lee, Cheng-Maw Ho, Chia-Hao Chang, Jann-Yuan Wang, Shih-Ming Chen

PLoS ONE, 2018

39 citations

Abstract

Human studies on the use of metformin as host-directed therapy (HDT) for tuberculosis (TB) are rare. We performed a nationwide cohort study to evaluate the effect of metformin on mitigating the risk of active TB among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Among newly diagnosed DM patients identified in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, metformin users, defined on the basis of >90 cumulative defined daily doses within 1 year, and propensity-score-matched metformin nonusers were selected. The primary outcome was incident TB, identified using diagnostic criteria validated by real patient data at a medical center. Independent predictors were investigated using Cox regression analysis. Similar analysis was performed in a subpopulation without a history of hypertensive nephropathy and renal replacement therapy. A total of 88,866 metformin users and 88,866 propensity-score-matched nonusers were selected. Validation results showed that the TB diagnostic criteria had a sensitivity of 99.13% and specificity of 99.90%. During follow-up, 707 metformin users and 807 nonusers developed active TB. Metformin use was independently associated with a lower risk of incident TB (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84 [0.74–0.96]). TB risk was lower in high-dose metformin users than in low-dose users (HR: 0.83 [0.72–0.97]). The effect of metformin remained when analysis was restricted in the subpopulation without renal function impairment. Newly diagnosed diabetic patients without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free