Reply to “Comment on ‘Spin and cyclotron energies of electrons in GaAs∕Ga1−xAlxAs quantum wells’ ”
Abstract
Responding to the previous Comment we quote the exact spin $g$ values of conduction electrons in bulk GaAs resulting from the three-level $\mathbf{P}∙\mathbf{p}$ model (3LM). We show that the approximate description of Ivchenko and Kiselev based on 3LM considerably overestimates the $g$ values for the interesting region of large ${k}_{z}$. We conclude that the three-level $\mathbf{P}∙\mathbf{p}$ model does not give an adequate description of orbital and spin electron energies in bulk GaAs and in $\mathrm{Ga}\mathrm{As}∕{\mathrm{Ga}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Al}}_{x}\mathrm{As}$ quantum wells.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Chaos and quantum thermalization
- The Dalton quantum chemistry program system
- Cord Blood Leptin and Adiponectin as Predictors of Adiposity in Children at 3 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Quantitative metabolomics by H-NMR and LC-MS/MS confirms altered metabolic pathways in diabetes
- Stable adiabatic quantum batteries
- A novel self-lipid antigen targets human T cells against CD1c(+) leukemias
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.