Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of lactic acidosis in type 2 diabetes patients with metformin in Japan

Chang CH, Sakaguchi M, Dolin P

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2016

491 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence of lactic acidosis (LA) and role of metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with anti-diabetes drugs.

METHODS: This retrospective propensity score matched cohort study was conducted using the Japanese Medical Data Vision claims database. T2DM patients aged 18 or above who received diabetes drugs during January 2010 through August 2014 were identified. Cases of LA were identified based on reimbursement codes and confirmed by lactic acid test and subsequent treatment by hemodialysis or intravenous sodium bicarbonate. Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the incidence and assess if metformin use was associated with increased risk of LA.

RESULTS: Thirty cases of LA were identified among 283 491 treated T2DM patients with 504 169 patient-years of follow-up. Crude incidence of LA was 5.95 per 100 000 patient-years. T2DM patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were seven-fold more likely to develop LA than those without CKD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 7.33, 95%CI, 3.17-16.96). Use of metformin was not associated with risk of LA in the study population (aHR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.33-2.55), and in the propensity score matched cohort (aHR, 0.90, 95%CI, 0.26-3.11). Similar findings were observed among diabetes patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and CKD. The age-sex adjusted incidence rates in metformin users and non-users were 5.80 and 5.78 per 100 000 person-years,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 491 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free