Evidence Hub

Comparative Evaluation of AES, Camellia, and CLEFIA for Lightweight Environments: A Post-2023 Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

J. Ojeniyi, O. Fasola, G. A. Onyeabor, A. Abdulsalam, I. Emmanuel, S. Baba, J. B. Jiya

Advances in Multidisciplinary & Scientific Research Journal Publication, 2026

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of resource-constrained Internet of Things (IoT) devices, embedded sensors, and edge computing platforms has intensified the demand for cryptographic primitives that strike a balance between security and stringent hardware and energy constraints. This paper presents a post-2023 systematic literature review and meta-analysis of three standardized block ciphers: the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Camellia, and CLEFIA, with a focus on their adaptation to lightweight environments. Drawing on Scopus-indexed research from 2021–2024, we evaluate architectural innovations, hardware/software optimizations, side-channel countermeasures, and quantum-resilience considerations. Our analysis demonstrates that while AES dominates in hardware-accelerated and certification-driven environments, CLEFIA is most efficient in ultra-constrained hardware, and Camellia provides a balanced solution for mid-range systems. Recent developments, including RISC-V cryptographic extensions and machine learning-assisted cryptanalysis, have reshaped performance and security expectations. Based on these findings, we propose a decision framework for cipher selection tailored to specific resource, energy, and certification constraints.

Keywords: Proof Construction, Procedural Fluency, Undergraduate Mathematics Majors,

APOS Theory, Scaffolded Instruction.

Journal Reference Format:

Ojeniyi, J.A., Fasola, O.O., Onyeabor, G.A., Abdulsalam, A., Emmanuel, I.O., Baba, S.U. & Jiya, J.B.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free