Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence for energy optimization in smart buildings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lakpriya Udayanga Gunasena Ekanayaka Gunasinghalge, Ammar Alazab, M. Talukder

Energy Informatics, 2025

24 citations

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluates artificial intelligence (AI) applications for energy optimization in smart buildings through comprehensive analysis of 126 peer-reviewed studies (2010–2024) from four major databases. We present a novel taxonomic framework categorizing AI implementations into five distinct approaches: predictive systems, adaptive control, pattern recognition, hybrid ensemble methods, and edge AI implementations. Our meta-analysis reveals significant performance variations: reinforcement learning achieves highest energy savings (22.3% ± 8.4%, 95% CI: 20.2–24.4%, I2 = 73%), followed by hybrid methods (28.1% ± 12.3%, 95% CI: 23.4–32.8%, I2 = 81%) and supervised learning (14.7% ± 5.2%, 95% CI: 12.9–16.5%, I2 = 45%). However, substantial heterogeneity exists across building types and climate zones. Critical findings include limited real-world deployment (18% academic literature, 26% including industry reports), predominant focus on office buildings (78%) and temperate climates (67%), and insufficient multi-system integration (76% single-system studies). Economic analysis indicates ROI periods of 2.1–5.8 years (median 3.4 years) with implementation costs varying from $8,000-$47,000 per facility. We identify five persistent research gaps and propose a prioritized research agenda addressing implementation barriers, standardization needs, and occupant-centric optimization. This study provides the first comprehensive benchmarking framework…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free