Evidence Hub

Does MOSES Technology Enhance the Efficiency and Outcomes of Standard Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

V. Gauhar, P. Gilling, G. Pirola, V. Chan, E. Lim, M. Maggi, J. Teoh, A. Krambeck et al.

European Urology Focus, 2022

45 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is currently the size-independent gold standard for surgical treatment of benign prostate enlargement (BPE).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the current literature and compare perioperative parameters, early outcomes, and complications after HoLEP with MOSES technology LEP (MoLEP) for BPE.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This study was performed according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework using the PICOS (Patient, Intervention Comparison, Outcome, Study) model to frame the clinical question. The population was adults undergoing LEP for BPE, with standard HoLEP as the intervention and MoLEP as the comparison. The outcomes were enucleation time, surgical time, haemostasis time, energy used, hospital length of stay (LOS), recatheterisation, urethral stricture rate, and functional outcomes. The study type included randomised, prospective nonrandomised, and retrospective studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven studies were included for meta-analysis after screening. Mean enucleation time was significantly shorter for MoLEP (mean difference [MD] -7.27 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.26 to -3.28; p = 0.0004). Postoperative LOS was significantly longer in the HoLEP group (MD 0.3 d, 95% CI -0.24-0.85,p<0.0001). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for higher incidence of recatheterisation (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 0.47-4.09; p = 0.55) and urethral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free