Evidence Hub

Metformin intake and risk of metabolic acidosis after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion: A comparative study using data from the TriNetX research network

Pallauf M, Brönimann S, Rezaee ME, Kohn TP, Fletcher SA, McNamara M, Enikeev D, Shariat SF et al.

Urologic oncology, 2025

1,986 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of diabetes mellitus and metformin use with metabolic acidosis risk after radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX Research Network data. Patients undergoing RC with continent diversion or ileal conduit for bladder cancer were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) and ICD-10 Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes. The primary outcome was acidosis between 1 month and 3 years postsurgery. Risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated based on diabetes and metformin use, stratified by diversion type and chronic kidney disease stage. Propensity score matching balanced potential confounders.

RESULTS: We identified 1,986 patients who underwent continent diversion and 11,184 who underwent ileal conduit reconstruction. In matched analyses, diabetes patients had higher acidosis risk (continent diversion: RR 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-2.51; ileal conduit: RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.66-2.27). The risk was highest for diabetes patients with metformin prescription (continent diversion: RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.63-2.61; ileal conduit: RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.84-2.47). However, among patients with diabetes, metformin use did not significantly affect acidosis rates in most analyses. Continent diversion patients had higher acidosis risk than ileal conduit patients (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.58-2.26).

CONCLUSION: Diabetes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,986 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free