Evidence Hub

Evaluation of metformin for epilepsy prevention or seizure control in people without evidence of diabetes: retrospective cohort study

Mbizvo GK, Mayer J, George SM, Bonnett LJ, Martin GP, Sperrin M, Schofield PG, Pickrell WO et al.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2026

16 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metformin demonstrates antiepileptogenic (primary prevention) and antiseizure (symptom control) properties in animal models of epilepsy. It is unclear whether these effects translate to humans, particularly outside diabetes, where metformin is increasingly prescribed for weight loss for example. We therefore addressed two questions in people without evidence of diabetes: (1) following an incident brain insult (ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, head injury or brain tumour), is metformin associated with reduced risk of first recorded seizure, epilepsy diagnosis or antiseizure medication (ASM) initiation? (2) In established epilepsy treated with ASMs, is metformin add-on associated with reduced risk of potentially seizure-related morbidity (coded seizures, emergency department attendances, hospital admissions, falls, injuries, burns or a composite of these) and all-cause mortality?

METHODS: We undertook an international retrospective cohort study of real-world healthcare data in TriNetX. Propensity score matched cohorts compared metformin against licensed weight-management comparators. Cox proportional hazards models estimated HRs with 95% CIs for 10 year outcomes.

RESULTS: 16 695 participants were included. Following brain insult, metformin was not associated with reduced risk of first recorded seizure, epilepsy diagnosis or ASM initiation. In established epilepsy, metformin add-on was associated with significantly lower hazards of coded seizures (HR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free