Evidence Hub

Effect of metformin by employing 2-hour postload insulin for measuring insulin resistance in Taiwanese women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Ou HT, Chen PC, Wu MH

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 2017

114 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Evidence on clinical effectiveness of metformin in ethnic Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) remains scarce. Standard diagnostic approaches to identify insulin resistance (IR) cases in PCOS patients might be invasive, labor intensive, and stressful for patients (i.e., euglycemic clamp), or somewhat complicated for clinicians to calculate and monitor in routine practice [i.e., the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI)]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of metformin in Taiwanese women with PCOS and identify the feasible diagnostic measures of IR for Taiwanese women with PCOS.

METHODS: A total of 114 women from a medical center in Taiwan were studied. All were aged between 18 years and 45 years, diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria, and treated with metformin. Outcome end points were body mass index (BMI) and 2-hour postload glucose and insulin levels from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS: BMI in overweight patients were significantly improved with metformin treatment duration (p < 0.001). The 2-hour insulin level statistically improved after treatment (before: 80.7 ± 63.9 μIU/mL vs. after: 65.0 ± 60.4 μIU/mL; p = 0.009). The improved 2-hour insulin level was significantly greater in IR patients than in non-IR patients. Compared with the 2-hour postload insulin level, the fasting insulin level provided 18.15% sensitivity and 94.12%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 114 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free