Evidence Hub

Metformin, other antidiabetic drugs, and endometrial cancer risk: a nested case–control study within Italian healthcare utilization databases

M. Franchi, R. Asciutto, Federica Nicotra, L. Merlino, C. la Vecchia, G. Corrao, C. Bosetti

European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2017

376 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

Metformin may reduce the risk of endometrial cancer whereas other drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus appear to increase it, although the evidence is still limited. We investigated this issue using data from a nested case–control study within the healthcare utilization databases of the Lombardy Region, Italy. This study included 376 diabetic women with endometrial cancer and 7485 diabetic controls matched for cases on age, date at cohort entry, and duration of follow-up. We used conditional logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of endometrial cancer in relation to use of antidiabetic drugs, adjusted for the Charlson’s comorbidity index, selected medical conditions, prescription of selected drugs, and concomitant use of other antidiabetic drugs. At cohort entry, no significant associations were observed for metformin [OR=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80–1.23], sulfonylureas (OR=1.14, 95% CI 0.91–1.42), insulin (OR=0.72, 95% CI 0.34–1.56), and other antidiabetic drugs (OR=1.21, 95% CI 0.75–1.95). When we considered use during follow-up, a borderline significant excess risk was found for metformin (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.00–1.70). However, this estimate decreased to 1.07 (95% CI 0.82–1.41) when taking into account BMI using a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. No significant associations were found for sulfonylureas (OR=1.16, 95% CI 0.91–1.47), thiazolidinediones (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.48–1.24), repaglinide (OR=1.32, 95% CI 0.94–1.87),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 376 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free