Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer (LC) remains the deadliest cancer, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Screening reduces mortality in high-risk individuals. Eligibility criteria in European and US screening guidelines have recently expanded. Therefore, we conducted an updated systematic review of risk-based models for identifying candidates for low-dose computed tomography screening and post-screening nodule classification.
Methods: We systematically searched Embase and Medline (January 2020-January 2026), identifying studies proposing new risk models in the context of LC screening. We separated models by pre- and post-screening risk stratification. Data extraction included study design, population, model type, risk horizon and model performance metrics. We performed an exploratory meta-regression of areas under the curve (AUCs) to assess whether sample size, model type, validation type and inclusion of biomarkers were associated with performance.
Results: Of 2462 records, 91 were included. 56 models were for screening selection (30 included biomarkers) and 35 for post-screening nodule classification. Regression-based models predominated, though machine-learning approaches were increasingly common. Discrimination ranged from moderate (AUC∼0.70) to excellent (>0.90), with biomarker and imaging-enhanced models often outperforming models without. Calibration was inconsistently reported and fewer than half underwent external validation.
Conclusion: We identified 91 risk prediction…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Promising Sources of Plant-Derived Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: A Narrative Review
- Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake in patients with chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cognition: an updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials
- The role of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A narrative review
- Paucity of evidence for a relationship between long-chain omega-3 fatty acid intake and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
- Omega-3 fatty acid nanocarriers: Characterization and potential applications
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.