Evidence Hub

Perception, assessment, and coaching: a systematic review and taxonomy of computer vision-based physical rehabilitation techniques

Ye P, Li Y, Qu M, Liu J, Lu X, Cao W, Wang R, Wan Y et al.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

The digital transformation of rehabilitation training has become a public health imperative driven by a global demand that outstrips professional medical resources and is compounded by a deficit in public rehabilitation literacy. As traditional hospital-centric models reach their scalability limits, there is a critical necessity for accessible home-based care solutions to ensure patients do not miss optimal recovery windows. To evaluate computer vision as a potential solution, this paper conducts a systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. We identify that its clinical migration faces a profound "Paradigm Gap" across three critical domains which this study aims to address: (1) the Perception Domain, where algorithms are constrained by inherent reconstruction ambiguities and pathological data scarcity; (2) the Assessment Domain, where a "semantic gap" persists between low-level features and clinical reasoning; and (3) the Coaching Domain, where feedback mechanisms fail to translate summative "Knowledge of Results (KR)" into actionable "Knowledge of Performance (KP)." We formulate and adopt "Perception, Assessment, and Coaching (PAC)" as a novel taxonomy to serve as a logical grid for systematically analyzing existing literature and elucidating technical pathways required to resolve these clinical challenges. This review synthesizes the technological landscape into three evolutionary trajectories: (1) In Perception, research is shifting toward…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free