Evidence Hub

Glycaemic control in native Kuwaiti Arab patients with type 2 diabetes

Channanath AM, AlWotayan R, Alkandari H, Davidsson L, Tuomilehto J, Thanaraj TA

Primary care diabetes, 2018

7,657 participants

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the influence of age at diabetes diagnosis, diabetes duration, BMI, comorbidity with hypertension and medication regimen on glycaemic control in native Kuwaiti Arab patients with T2D.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study considered 7657 patients from Kuwait Diabetes Registry and analysed data from their laboratory and hospital records.

RESULTS: HbA1c and prevalence of hypertension increased significantly with diabetes duration. Duration of diabetes (β=0.034; P<0.001) and age at diagnosis (β=-0.03; P<0.001) were independently associated with HbA1c. Inadequate glycaemic control was more likely in patients diagnosed at <60 than in those ≥60 years of age (OR:1.80, 95%-CI:1.39-2.31). Increasing duration of diabetes witnessed decrease in metformin prescription and increase in sulfonylureas prescription; proportion of patients treated with insulin increased from 5.6% to 44.4% in 9 years of diagnosis. Patients with 9-years duration of diabetes or with combination therapy of insulin-metformin-sulfonylureas differed in mean BMI for adequate or inadequate glycaemic control (29.5 versus 31.2kg/m2; P<0.001 and 29.8 versus 33.2; P<0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Only 25.6% of the T2D patients in this ethnic cohort exhibited adequate glycaemic control. The delineated relationship of inadequate glycaemic control with diabetes duration, onset age, obesity and hypertension prevalence has a bearing on diabetes management programs for Arabs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 7,657 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free