Evidence Hub

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

Y. Yoshioka, T. Nose, K. Yoshida, T. Inoue, H. Yamazaki, E. Tanaka, H. Shiomi, A. Imai et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2000

22 participants · 145 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To improve results for localized prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of hyperfractionated Iridium-192 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy was initiated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1995 and September 1998, 22 implants were performed on 22 patients with localized prostate cancer (T1:T2:T3:T4 = 4:6:9:3) at Osaka University Hospital. Nineteen patients, who had T3-T4 tumors or pretreatment PSA >/= 20.0 ng/mL, received hormone therapy. No patient had external beam radiation. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance were performed, followed by dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice a day, with a time interval of more than 6 h. Total dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Median follow-up time was 31 months.

RESULTS

HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy was well-tolerated. No significant intra- or peri-operative complications occurred. No patient experienced acute toxicity of grade 3 or more. PSA levels normalized in 95% of patients within 20 months after irradiation. Four-year clinical and biochemical relapse-free rates were 95% and 55%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Acute toxicity with this method was acceptable. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free