Evidence Hub

Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005-2014

Liu C, Foti K, Grams ME, Shin JI, Selvin E

Journal of general internal medicine, 2020

28,461 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that treatment with metformin be considered for prevention of type 2 diabetes in persons with prediabetes. However, metformin use outside the setting of diagnosed diabetes in US adults is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in self-reported prediabetes and treatment with metformin. We also compared characteristics of adults self-reported prediabetes who were vs. were not taking metformin.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.

PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥ 20 years of age who participated in the 2005-2014 National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES), n = 28,461.

APPROACH: We characterized trends in self-reported prediabetes and metformin use in this population. We used multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of metformin use among adults with self-reported prediabetes. All analyses accounted for the weighted complex survey design to generate nationally representative estimates.

KEY RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported prediabetes increased from 5.1% in 2005-2006 to 7.4% in 2013-2014 (P-for-trend < 0.001). In persons with self-reported prediabetes, metformin use increased, from 2.4 to 8.3% (P-for-trend = 0.013). Adults who were taking metformin were more likely to be obese and to report trying to lose weight in the past year.

CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported prediabetes has increased in the past decade. Metformin use in the setting of prediabetes has also increased but…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 28,461 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free