Evidence Hub

Comparative Study of Efficacy of Preemptive Use of Opioid-free Anesthesia Using Paracetamol, Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, Dexamethasone versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response, Perioperative Analgesia, and Postoperative Recovery Profile during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Parallel Group Trial

Soujanya PS, Singh AK, Singh E, Singh SP, Singh RB, Pratap A

Annals of African medicine, 2026

60 participants

Abstract

Background: Opioids such as fentanyl are widely used in general anesthesia for intraoperative analgesia; however, their use is associated with adverse effects, including respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ileus, and risk of opioid-related hyperalgesia. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has emerged as an alternative approach utilizing nonopioid agents to provide adequate analgesia while minimizing opioid-related complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of OFA with fentanyl-based anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized study included 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, allocated into two groups ( n = 30 each). Group P received OFA with intravenous paracetamol, magnesium sulfate, lignocaine, and dexamethasone while Group F received fentanyl-based anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded intraoperatively. Postoperative pain (Numerical Rating Scale), time to first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, and incidence of PONV were assessed. Data were analyzed using Student's t -test and Chi-square test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The study included 60 patients (30 per group) and demonstrated comparable outcomes between groups. Transient intraoperative differences were noted in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free