Evidence Hub

Widespread Self-Medication and Unsafe Access to Analgesics and NSAIDs in Urban Conakry, Guinea: Structural Determinants, Epidemiological Patterns, and Health System Implications – A Cross-Sectional Study of 1,032 Participants

Lawa Garandji D, Balde AO

2026

1,032 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Background: Self-medication with analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common in low- and middle-income countries and may expose users to preventable adverse outcomes. Evidence from Guinea remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of self-medication with analgesics and NSAIDs among pharmacy clients in urban Conakry, identify associated factors, and describe clinical risk situations.

Methods: We conducted a pharmacy-based analytical cross-sectional study in 30 private pharmacies across Conakry, Guinea. A total of 1,032 participants seeking analgesics or NSAIDs were enrolled between November 3, 2012, and April 5, 2013. Self-medication was defined as acquisition or use without a valid medical prescription. Factors associated with self-medication were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Among 1,032 participants, 603 reported self-medication (prevalence 58.4%). Previous unsupervised use was reported by 78.7%. The most frequently used medicines were paracetamol (56.9%, n=587), diclofenac (21.3%, n=220), ibuprofen (17.9%, n=185), and aspirin (3.9%, n=40). Overall, 68.0% (n=702) reported no knowledge of potential adverse effects. Clinical risk situations were frequent: gastrointestinal disorders (41.3%, n=426), hypertension (9.2%, n=95), and pregnancy exposure among reproductive-age women (26.0%). In multivariable analysis, self-medication was independently associated with previous analgesic/NSAID use (aOR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,032 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free