Evidence Hub

Factors associated with severe lower extremity artery disease in type 2 diabetes based on a large scale claims database in Japan

Horii T, Kawaguchi M, Ikegami Y, Oikawa Y, Shimada A, Mihara K

Scientific reports, 2025

243,606 participants

Abstract

Diabetic foot lesions are becoming increasingly prevalent due to increases in type 2 diabetes (T2D), aging populations, and atherosclerotic diseases. Individuals with T2D with comorbid lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) are particularly susceptible. Although pharmacological therapies are often combined with risk management strategies, like exercise and smoking cessation, their roles in preventing LEAD progression are unclear. Herein, we investigated factors suppressing LEAD progression in T2D. Using data from the DeSC database, this retrospective cross-sectional study defined severe LEAD as a diagnosis requiring revascularization (Revasc). Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for associated factors. The analysis included 243,606 patients with T2D divided into two groups; those with (n = 890) and without (n = 242,716) Revasc. Subgroup analysis of patients with LEAD (n = 27,258) with (n = 890) and without (n = 26,368) Revasc was also conducted. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) (OR 0.50), metformin (OR 0.78), and fibrates (OR 0.75) were associated with a significant reduction in severe LEAD in the primary and subgroup analyses. In conclusion, the active use of SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, and fibrates may help prevent LEAD progression. However, these medications are associated with adverse events, making it essential to manage patients individually to optimize benefits while minimizing risks.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 243,606 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free