Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of Intravenous Paracetamol Versus Dipyrone for Postoperative Analgesia After Day-case Lower Abdominal Surgery in Children With Spinal Anesthesia: a Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2011

2 participants

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of intravenous paracetamol and dipyrone for preventing pain during early postoperative period in school-age children undergoing lower abdominal surgery with spinal anesthesia.

Conditions: Other Acute Postoperative Pain.

Primary outcome: Change from pain intensity until postoperative 6 hours.

Enrollment: 2 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free