Evidence Hub

Patterns and preferences of antidiabetic drug use in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - A nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD treatment study)

Haymana C, Sonmez A, Demirci I, Fidan Yaylalı G, Nuhoglu I, Sancak S, Yilmaz M, Altuntas Y et al.

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2021

4,678 participants

Abstract

AIMS: The treatment preferences in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are affected by multiple factors. This survey aims to find out the profiles of the utilization of antidiabetics and their determinants.

METHODS: The nationwide, multicenter TEMD survey consecutively enrolled patients with T2DM (n = 4678). Medications including oral antidiabetics (OAD) and injectable regimens were recorded. Multiple injectable regimens with or without OADs were defined as complex treatments.

RESULTS: A total of 4678 patients with T2DM (mean age: 58.5 ± 10.4 years, 59% female) were enrolled. More than half of patients (n = 2372; 50.7%) were using injectable regimens with or without OADs, and others (n = 2306, 49.3%) were using only OADs. The most common OADs were metformin (93.5%), secretagogues (40.1%), and DPP-4 inhibitors (37.2%). The rates of the use of basal, basal-bolus and premix insulin were 26.5%, 39.5% and 22.4%, respectively. Patients using OADs achieved better glycemia, blood pressure and weight control (p < 0.001 for all) but poorer LDL-C control (p < 0.001). The independent associates of complex treatments were diabetes duration, obesity, eGFR, glycated haemoglobin, macro and microvascular complications, education level, and self-reported hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION: This study is the first nationwide report to show that almost half of the patients with T2DM are using injectable regimens in Turkey.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 4,678 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free