Evidence Hub

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Childhood

Bérard A, Cottin J, Leal LF, Picot C, Pleau J, Friedman JM, Damkier P, Cucherat M et al.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2026

2,668,689 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in children.

METHOD: We conducted a comprehensive search of major bibliographic databases and gray literature to identify human studies evaluating the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and the risk of NDDs in offspring. Pooled odds ratios (ORpooled) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in random-effects meta-analysis by type of NDD. We performed sensitivity analysis including a bounding method (E-value) and probabilistic bias analysis.

RESULTS: Of 2,002 studies retrieved, 16 studies met eligibility criteria, and were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of studies assessing the risk of NDDs associated with gestational exposure to acetaminophen were on attention-deficit disorders with or without hyperactivity (ADHD, 6 studies, N = 2,668,689), followed by language disorders (5 studies, N = 31,104) and psychomotor developmental disorders/delay (3 studies, N = 30,824). Acetaminophen use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of ADHD, when ADHD was assessed with a physician-based diagnosis or psychometric tests (ORpooled = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08-1.27). The estimated E-value of 1.61 suggests that the observed association may be partly due to unmeasured confounders. Non-differential exposure misclassification biased results toward the null and differential misclassification potentially biased them away…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,668,689 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free