Evidence Hub

Analgesic efficacy of sacral erector spinae plane block in pediatric infraumbilical surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Kozanhan B, Satici MH, Yildiz M, Tutar MS

Minerva anestesiologica, 2026

437 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric infraumbilical surgeries often lead to significant postoperative pain. Sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided technique that targets the sacral fascial plane and may provide extended analgesia with minimal motor block. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-ESPB in pediatric patients compared to conventional regional techniques or no block at all.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251054390). A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing S-ESPB to caudal blocks, penile blocks, ring blocks, or no block in pediatric patients. The primary outcome was time to first request for rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes encompassed early postoperative (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) FLACC scores, 24-hour paracetamol consumption, the need for rescue analgesia, and adverse events. The risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2, and the evidence's certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Six trials involving 437 participants were included in the review. S-ESPB significantly prolonged the time to first request for rescue analgesia compared to caudal, ring, penile, or no block (SMD: 4.02; 95% CI: 0.92-7.11; P=0.011). Subgroup analyses…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 437 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free