Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions for Pregnancy-Related lumbopelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mladenovic M, Coughlan LM, Nascimento PRCD, Simmons MJ, Dufour S, Spadoni G, Macedo LG

Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026

3,279 participants

Abstract

Background: Lumbopelvic pain (LPP) is common during pregnancy. However, there is a lack of strong systematic reviews summarizing the evidence on conservative care.

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions compared to standard obstetric care (SOC) or other treatments for physical function, pain intensity, and quality of life in pregnant women with LPP.

Methods: Medline, Emcare, Embase, AMED, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating physiotherapy interventions for pregnancy-related LPP. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and evidence was summarized using the GRADE framework. When appropriate, a meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the available evidence.

Results: Thirty-one trials were included (n = 3279 screened): 23 investigated exercise, 7 manual therapy, 3 electrophysical modalities, and 2 education. Exercise was not better than SOC for the short-term pain (low certainty evidence, MD = -18.80, 95 % CI -45.97 to 8.33), but was superior at 6-12 weeks (moderate certainty evidence, MD = -25.84, 95 % CI -35.04 to -16.64). After a sensitivity analysis, exercise significantly improved physical function compared to SOC at 0-5 weeks (low certainty evidence, SMD= -0.65 95 % CI -1.25 to -0.04). Exercise was superior to SOC at 6-12 weeks (very-low certainty evidence, SMD= -2.79 95 % CI -4.64 to -0.95).

Conclusion: Exercise…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,279 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free