Evidence Hub

Continuous ketamine infusion for surgical patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment

Alzmmam AI, Alghanem RF, Alshahrani A, Aljawaied R, Alolayqi FS, Alanazi SK, Alanazi L, Alkawabah G et al.

Critical care (London, England), 2026

666 participants

Abstract

Background: Optimal pain and sedation management in intensive care unit (ICU) remains challenging. While opioids and benzodiazepines are widely used, their adverse effects highlight the need for alternative or adjunctive strategies. Ketamine, with its analgesic and opioid-sparing has been proposed as an adjuvant. However, current evidence regarding its efficacy in ICU patients, particularly within the surgical population, remains inconclusive. We evaluated whether continuous low-dose ketamine infusion in postoperative surgical ICU patients reduces opioid consumption and improves pain intensity, and whether it affects opioid-related adverse events and key ICU recovery outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing continuous postoperative ketamine infusion versus non-ketamine based infusion for analgesia & sedation in patients admitted to the surgical ICU. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until July 2025. The primary endpoints were cumulative opioid consumption in the first 24-48 h (standardized to IV morphine equivalents where applicable) and rest pain intensity at prespecified early postoperative timepoints. Secondary endpoints included PONV, psychotomimetic events (e.g., hallucinations), and ICU recovery outcomes (e.g., ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation) when reported. We performed random-effects meta-analyses…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 666 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free