Evidence Hub

Assessment of Mpox knowledge and attitudes among health workers in Egypt and Arab countries based on a national survey and a meta-analysis

Elsawy NH, Ashmawy R, Elmallah AAEAE, Ellatif MMA, Mokhtar SMA, Abdelwahab RM, Elsronbaw SSA, Elsharkawy A et al.

Scientific reports, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Recent Mpox outbreaks in non-endemic countries have highlighted the importance of global health preparedness. Combined national survey and pooled analysis were conducted to assess the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare workers (HCWs) toward Mpox in Egypt and the Arab region. An online survey was distributed to HCWs in Egypt, and a literature search of PubMed and other sources was performed to identify relevant studies from Arab countries. Descriptive statistics were utilized for all variables, with chi-square and t-tests used for comparisons. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore factors of heterogeneity. A total of 399 eligible HCWs from various Egyptian health facilities were included. The mean age of participants was 35.6 ± 7.1 years; the majority were female, married, pharmacists, and had at least five years of experience. The survey revealed that only 37.6% of Egyptian HCWs had good knowledge of Mpox, while 97.9% held positive attitudes. The meta-analysis of 30 studies from Arab countries including both HCWs and the general population, showed a pooled proportion of 35% (95% CI: 31%-39%) for good knowledge and 48% (95% CI: 37%-59%) for positive attitude. A higher positive attitude was significantly associated with female gender and HCWs. Significant knowledge gaps regarding Mpox exist among HCWs in Egypt and the wider Arab region, despite generally positive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free