Evidence Hub

Factors Contributing to Variability in Longitudinal Pain Scores in Osteoarthritis Randomised Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bentin JM, Kaaber AB, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bihlet AR

European journal of pain (London, England), 2026

36,246 participants

Abstract

Background and objectives: Osteoarthritis is a prevalent joint disease causing pain and functional decline, but high variability in patient-reported treatment outcomes in clinical trials challenges detection of treatment effects. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in pain reporting and identify trial characteristics, placebo comparator attributes, and participant clinical characteristics associated with this variability.

Databases and data treatment: A systematic review of placebo-controlled RCTs for pharmacological interventions in knee osteoarthritis was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines and registered at Open Science Framework. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for trials from 2010 to October 2024. The primary outcome was variability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled variability of WOMAC pain change.

Results: From 1318 records, 87 reports involving 36,246 participants were included. The overall mean variability (SD) of WOMAC pain change was 20.7 on a normalised 0-100 scale, with an absolute mean change of 17.3. Variability was linked to trial size, number of sites, study arms, and baseline pain scores. Smaller studies and those with fewer sites showed lower variability. Topical and intra-articular placebo administration were associated with lower variability. Baseline BMI and pain scores influenced variability, while age and sex did…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 36,246 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free