Evidence Hub

Efficacy of psychological treatment for tension-type headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuan L, Pantila K, Niu XY, Zhang YX, Yang F, Zheng H

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

1,069 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of psychological interventions for Tension-Type Headache (TTH) via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing psychological interventions with controls in patients with TTH. The primary outcome was the number of headache days per month, while secondary outcomes were headache intensity and the treatment response rate. The second version of the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results: Nineteen studies with 1069 participants were included. For the primary outcome, psychological interventions reduced the number of headache days per month compared to controls (5 studies, MD=-4.53, 95% CI: -5.52 to -3.54, p 2 = 35%), with moderate-quality evidence. For secondary outcomes, the treatment response rate was higher in the intervention group (7 studies, RR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.48, p < 0.01, I²=41%). Psychological interventions also decreased headache intensity compared to controls (10 studies, MD=-1.88, 95% CI: -2.72 to -1.04, p < 0.01, I²=93%). Subgroup analysis of headache intensity indicated significant differences between interventions (P = 0.01), suggesting effect heterogeneity across psychological modalities.

Conclusions: Psychological interventions effectively reduce the number of headache days,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,069 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free