Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Articular Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dos Santos MG, da Rosa WLO, Sbardelotto C, de Araújo JSG, da Silva Rodrigues C, Boscato N

Oral diseases, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the most effective minimally invasive intra-articular procedure for reducing pain and improving maximum mouth opening (MMO) in individuals diagnosed with painful articular TMD, specifically TMJ osteoarthritis and/or internal derangement.

Materials and methods: Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of minimally invasive procedures, such as arthrocentesis and intra-articular injection (IAI), were included. The meta-analysis included seven studies with a 6-month follow-up, while 23 studies with different follow-up periods were evaluated qualitatively.

Results: The meta-analysis showed that IAI with tenoxicam was the most effective procedure for pain reduction, with the highest [7.44 mean difference (MD); 6.28-8.60 confidence interval (CI)], followed by opioids (5.93; 5.03-6.83), the combination of hyaluronic acid (HA) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (5.10; 4.52-5.68), and PRP alone (4.99; 3.13-6.85). For improvement in MMO, tenoxicam had the highest MD (+11.50 mm; 15.47-7.53), followed by PRP (+10.46 mm; 14.89-6.02) and the HA-PRP combination (+10.10 mm; 11.89-8.31).

Conclusions: Tenoxicam showed promising results for pain reduction and improvement in MMO, although the evidence remains limited, followed by opioids and the combination of HA and PRP with arthrocentesis. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm their clinical applicability.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free